Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

uos make puppet-wechat great again #206

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 14, 2022
Merged

uos make puppet-wechat great again #206

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 14, 2022

Conversation

leochen-g
Copy link
Contributor

uos 协议又可以重新使用了

@leochen-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

有个lint 报错好像是项目之前就有的报错,是数据没有初始化,和本次提交无管

@LIUHanyang96
Copy link

关注一下

@lx0758
Copy link

lx0758 commented Jul 14, 2022

mark

@leochen-g leochen-g requested a review from pacoyang July 14, 2022 02:18
Copy link
Member

@huan huan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix!

Please follow my reviews, and also remember to make sure the CI turns green before we can continue reviewing this PR!

package.json Outdated
@@ -61,6 +62,8 @@
"@types/qr-image": "^3.2.5",
"@types/request": "^2.48.8",
"@types/xml2js": "^0.4.9",
"qrcode-terminal": "^0.12.0",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove unrelated dependencies.

@@ -82,6 +80,7 @@ type PuppetWeChatOptions = PUPPET.PuppetOptions & {
launchOptions? : LaunchOptions
stealthless? : boolean
uos? : boolean
token? : string
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please explain what's this token for? It seems that it does not been referenced in the new code.

@huan
Copy link
Member

huan commented Jul 14, 2022

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants