Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Application: Polkadot Runtime Releaser #2373

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor

Project Abstract

Please replace these instructions with a brief description of your project summarising key points (1-2 paragraphs).

If your application is a follow-up to a previous grant, please mention which one in the first line of the abstract and include a link to previous pull requests if applicable.

Grant level

  • Level 1: Up to $10,000, 2 approvals
  • Level 2: Up to $30,000, 3 approvals
  • Level 3: Unlimited, 5 approvals (for >$100k: Web3 Foundation Council approval)

Application Checklist

  • The application template has been copied and aptly renamed (project_name.md).
  • I have read the application guidelines.
  • Payment details have been provided (Polkadot AssetHub (DOT, USDC & USDT) address in the application and bank details via email, if applicable).
  • I understand that an agreed upon percentage of each milestone will be paid in vested DOT, to the Polkadot address listed in the application.
  • I am aware that, in order to receive a grant, I (and the entity I represent) have to successfully complete a KYC/KYB check.
  • The software delivered for this grant will be released under an open-source license specified in the application.
  • The initial PR contains only one commit (squash and force-push if needed).
  • The grant will only be announced once the first milestone has been accepted (see the announcement guidelines).
  • I prefer the discussion of this application to take place in a private Element/Matrix channel. My username is: @_______:matrix.org (change the homeserver if you use a different one)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 21, 2024

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@github-actions github-actions bot added the admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. label Aug 21, 2024
@AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement.

Copy link
Contributor

@keeganquigley keeganquigley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @AurevoirXavier thanks for the application. We don't offer payments on ETH mainnet anymore, can you change the payment address to accept USDC on Asset Hub instead? Thanks!

@keeganquigley keeganquigley self-assigned this Aug 27, 2024
@keeganquigley keeganquigley added the changes requested The team needs to clarify a few things first. label Aug 27, 2024
@AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @AurevoirXavier thanks for the application. We don't offer payments on ETH mainnet anymore, can you change the payment address to accept USDC on Asset Hub instead? Thanks!

Done. :)

@keeganquigley
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @AurevoirXavier I will mark the application as ready for review so the committee can comment. In the meantime, one further question:

Your previous grant deliveries were highly rated, but the repos appear to be no longer maintained. What assurances can you give us that you will keep improving and maintaining the CLI tool after the grant milestone is complete? Also can you give an update on the status of Subalfred?

@keeganquigley keeganquigley added ready for review The project is ready to be reviewed by the committee members. and removed changes requested The team needs to clarify a few things first. labels Aug 28, 2024
@AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor Author

AurevoirXavier commented Aug 29, 2024

Your previous grant deliveries were highly rated, but the repos appear to be no longer maintained. What assurances can you give us that you will keep improving and maintaining the CLI tool after the grant milestone is complete? Also can you give an update on the status of Subalfred?

You can verify that I've made significant improvements after the last delivery. At present, the project is not in active development, but all existing features are functioning well, and I personally use it daily. I've also attempted to recommend this useful tool to others, but it seems I'm not getting enough attention. Perhaps a co-promotion would be beneficial. I haven't received enough feedback, and since my focuse move to node/runtime maintenance last year, I haven't came out much new features for Subalfred.

Also, I believe one reason is that it's a CLI tool. Many users prefer a straightforward website where they can click a few buttons to achieve their desired results rather than installing a CLI tool. For instance, obtaining a twoxxhash result. I do have plans to apply for a maintenance grant to develop SubalfredV2 and transition it to the web.

Noc2
Noc2 previously approved these changes Aug 29, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@Noc2 Noc2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the application. Given your previous work, I'm happy to support it.

keeganquigley
keeganquigley previously approved these changes Aug 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@keeganquigley keeganquigley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your answers @AurevoirXavier I'm also happy to approve it.

We recently started doing KYC/KYB for grantees. While waiting for the third approval, could you please go through the verification process for hack-ink? Thanks!

Let me know if you have any issues during the process.

@AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let me know if you have any issues during the process.

Thank you for the info.

As I mentioned in the application README.

### Legal Structure

Personal. (no legal structure entry)

hack-ink doesn't really be registered as a real company(in legal). I host all the code source under the hack-ink GitHub organization. So I use it as the Team name.

Then my question is what company document show I upload for this? Should I change to a personal KYC and how?

@keeganquigley
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @AurevoirXavier thanks for the explanation, in that case, you can just do KYC verification. Thanks.

@AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor Author

AurevoirXavier commented Sep 1, 2024

Hi @AurevoirXavier thanks for the explanation, in that case, you can just do KYC verification. Thanks.

I can't see the detailed error on my side. And I can't try it again. Should I use a new email address to try?

Unfortunately, we couldn't verify your identity
We could not verify your profile. If you have any questions, please contact the Company where you try to verify your profile

@keeganquigley
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @AurevoirXavier thanks for letting us know, still looking into this. Will let you know when I have an update.

@AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @AurevoirXavier thanks for letting us know, still looking into this. Will let you know when I have an update.

BTW, I have double identities. I can try using another one. Previously, I used the HongKong identity, which may not be supported.

@keeganquigley
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @AurevoirXavier sure feel free to try the alternative one if you want, right now the current one is having issues being accepted.

@AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @AurevoirXavier sure feel free to try the alternative one if you want, right now the current one is having issues being accepted.

image

I attempted to use all my identities, including ID cards and passport. The identity document and selfie are passed. However, it consistently fails at the applicant data stage. I'm unsure of the reason. My legal name on the document is not my English name; it is presented in the local language. Does this have an impact?

image

Copy link
Member

@PieWol PieWol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @AurevoirXavier the Polkadot Runtime Releaser sounds like a great project. Could you please for the sake of completeness add a Polkadot relay chain address to which you want to receive the vested DOT?

@AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @AurevoirXavier the Polkadot Runtime Releaser sounds like a great project. Could you please for the sake of completeness add a Polkadot relay chain address to which you want to receive the vested DOT?

Hi! Does this mean I can only accept vested DOT instead of USDC on AH?

@PieWol
Copy link
Member

PieWol commented Sep 10, 2024

Hey, no it doesn't mean you can't be paid in USDC at all. In our FAQ you can see that all grants are 50% paid in vested DOT. If thats fine for you it would be great to also tick the box in your application and include the relay chain address.

@AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey, no it doesn't mean you can't be paid in USDC at all. In our FAQ you can see that all grants are 50% paid in vested DOT. If thats fine for you it would be great to also tick the box in your application and include the relay chain address.

Didn't notice that. The last grant I submitted was a year ago.

Thanks, added.

@PieWol
Copy link
Member

PieWol commented Sep 10, 2024

Great, thanks.

Copy link
Member

@PieWol PieWol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm happy to approve it.

@keeganquigley
Copy link
Contributor

keeganquigley commented Sep 11, 2024

Hi @AurevoirXavier I just sent you an email regarding KYC. I used the one you provided in your profile, so let me know if you receive it. Thanks!

@AurevoirXavier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @AurevoirXavier I just sent you an email regarding KYC. I used the one you provided in your profile, so let me know if you receive it. Thanks!

Thanks, replied.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. ready for review The project is ready to be reviewed by the committee members.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants