-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vendor ipaddress and email.utils; renorm ipv4 and ipv6 types based on updated ipaddress corrections (SYN-5490, SYN-7937) #3902
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3902 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 96.31% 96.32%
=========================================
Files 245 252 +7
Lines 54822 58329 +3507
=========================================
+ Hits 52802 56185 +3383
- Misses 2020 2144 +124
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Should we be counting test coverage in vendored code? |
@MichaelSquires Let me add their unit tests and make them subclass the VendorTest helper 👍 |
Co-authored-by: blackout <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Cisphyx <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like we're picking up the vendor test files in coverage, should we add synapse/vendor/**/test_*.py
to the omit in .coveragerc
?
… for vendored tests as no-cover
@Cisphyx I removed some of the tests that we'll never run ( osx 10.7 tests... ) and their associated helpers. I actually don't mind having coverage reporting for those vendored tests as it does give us insight into what behaviors the original authors have / had from their original files. |
Related cpython issue python/cpython#113171 |
No description provided.