Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Loose boto3 requirements #457

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

Loose boto3 requirements #457

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

iurisilvio
Copy link
Contributor

@iurisilvio iurisilvio commented Jun 7, 2024

Description

Bump the max boto3 version to avoid pip trying to install many versions before finding one that works.

It is reasonably safe, boto3 is very stable.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How has this change been tested, please provide a testcase or example of how you tested the change?

🟢 CI pass 🟢

@iurisilvio iurisilvio changed the title Remove boto3 from requirements Loose boto3 requirements Jun 7, 2024
@iurisilvio iurisilvio marked this pull request as ready for review June 7, 2024 11:13
@PawelPeczek-Roboflow
Copy link
Collaborator

Does it solve the problem with aws-cli?

@iurisilvio
Copy link
Contributor Author

@PawelPeczek-Roboflow
Copy link
Collaborator

amazing

@@ -23,6 +23,6 @@ pydantic~=2.6
openai>=1.12.0
structlog>=24.1.0
zxing-cpp>=2.2.0
boto3<=1.28.23
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could we align with current max version such that we do not move so far into the unknown versions

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure! I limited to current version!

Now that we understand the problem, we just have to remember to sometimes bump this limit. Or we could limit botocore and awscli versions too, because they're implicitly limited anyway.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am fine with both, yet prefer explicit

@PawelPeczek-Roboflow
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Collaborator

@PawelPeczek-Roboflow PawelPeczek-Roboflow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

under condition of GHA passing

@PawelPeczek-Roboflow
Copy link
Collaborator

all 🟢 - u are free to merge

@iurisilvio iurisilvio merged commit 485adc3 into main Jun 11, 2024
52 checks passed
@iurisilvio iurisilvio deleted the loose-boto3 branch June 11, 2024 10:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants