Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-29952: Use usual terminology of dict #917

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2017
Merged

bpo-29952: Use usual terminology of dict #917

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2017

Conversation

cocoatomo
Copy link
Contributor

see Issue29952.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@cocoatomo, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @birkenfeld, @vadmium and @benjaminp to be potential reviewers.

@methane methane changed the title Issue29952: Use usual terminology of dict bpo-29952: Use usual terminology of dict Mar 31, 2017
@methane methane merged commit cdcac03 into python:master Mar 31, 2017
methane pushed a commit to methane/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2017
s/keys and elements/keys and values/
(cherry picked from commit cdcac03)
methane pushed a commit to methane/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2017
s/keys and elements/keys and values/
(cherry picked from commit cdcac03)
@cocoatomo cocoatomo deleted the dict-terminology branch April 1, 2017 02:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants