Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-33807: Add Python 3.7 to .github/CONTRIBUTING.rst #7532

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2018
Merged

bpo-33807: Add Python 3.7 to .github/CONTRIBUTING.rst #7532

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2018

Conversation

suriyaa
Copy link
Contributor

@suriyaa suriyaa commented Jun 8, 2018

Hello @python community,

This is my first Python pull request! 😄

This solves bpo-33807: https://bugs.python.org/issue33807.

--Suriyaa Sundararuban (My Python profile) (My Bugs Profile)

https://bugs.python.org/issue33807

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

When your account is ready, please add a comment in this pull request
and a Python core developer will remove the CLA not signed label
to make the bot check again.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

@suriyaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

suriyaa commented Jun 8, 2018

Ok. I filled out and signed the PSF contributor form. We need to wait at least one US business day to ask for a CLA recheck.

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Build Status

- master

+ `Stable buildbots <http://buildbot.python.org/3.x.stable/>`_
+ `Stable buildbots <http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/masters/>`_
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"better" is a pure judgement call, unfortunately. I prefer the builders page, but I believe others prefer the grid page. The grid page does at least attempt to match up builds with commits, so that one may actually be better.

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Build Status

- master

+ `Stable buildbots <http://buildbot.python.org/3.x.stable/>`_
+ `Stable buildbots <http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/masters/>`_

- 3.6
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You also need to fix the links of 3.6 and 2.7 branches.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@berkerpeksag 👍 Yes. I didn't find links that matches.

Copy link
Member

@zware zware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was actually able to restore the /3.x.stable/ (and similar) redirects, so the links here now work basically as expected. However, we do need to add 3.7 to this list, which this PR could be repurposed to do :)

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Build Status

- master

+ `Stable buildbots <http://buildbot.python.org/3.x.stable/>`_
+ `Stable buildbots <http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/masters/>`_
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"better" is a pure judgement call, unfortunately. I prefer the builders page, but I believe others prefer the grid page. The grid page does at least attempt to match up builds with commits, so that one may actually be better.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@suriyaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

suriyaa commented Jun 8, 2018

@zware 👍 Ok. I'm going to add 3.7.

@suriyaa suriyaa changed the title bpo-33807: Fix 'Stable buildbots' link for master-branch bpo-33807: Add Python 3.7 to .github/CONTRIBUTING.rst Jun 8, 2018
@suriyaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

suriyaa commented Jun 8, 2018

@zware I updated the pull request (change pr title & rebase Git commits).

@suriyaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

suriyaa commented Jun 8, 2018

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@zware: please review the changes made to this pull request.

Copy link
Member

@zware zware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@suriyaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

suriyaa commented Jun 8, 2018

:shipit: 😁

@zware zware merged commit 9e6685e into python:master Jun 8, 2018
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @SuriyaaKudoIsc for the PR, and @zware for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@zware
Copy link
Member

zware commented Jun 8, 2018

@SuriyaaKudoIsc Thanks for your contribution!

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2018
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-7540 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

@suriyaa suriyaa deleted the fix-issue-33807 branch June 8, 2018 16:04
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants