Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Trivial] Fix a memory leak in _msi.c #4127

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2017

Conversation

ZackerySpytz
Copy link
Contributor

If test_msilib had any non-trivial tests, this memory leak would cause test_msilib to fail when run with the -R option.

@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ msiobj_dealloc(msiobj* msidb)
{
MsiCloseHandle(msidb->h);
msidb->h = 0;
PyObject_Del(msidb);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure that calling PyObject_Del() in dealloc is correct. Maybe you should call Py_TYPE(op)->tp_free(op); instead.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the documentation of tp_dealloc() (https://docs.python.org/3.7/c-api/typeobj.html#c.PyTypeObject.tp_dealloc):

If the type is not subtypable (doesn’t have the Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE flag bit set), it is permissible to call the object deallocator directly instead of via tp_free.

As none of the four types in _msi.c set a tp_free() function, it is correct to call PyObject_Del() here (this is done by many other types).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh ok. I checked and you are right: range_dealloc() also calls PyObject_Del() for example.

I forgot that PyObject_Del() is simply an alias to PyObject_Free(), a memory deallocator.

Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ msiobj_dealloc(msiobj* msidb)
{
MsiCloseHandle(msidb->h);
msidb->h = 0;
PyObject_Del(msidb);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh ok. I checked and you are right: range_dealloc() also calls PyObject_Del() for example.

I forgot that PyObject_Del() is simply an alias to PyObject_Free(), a memory deallocator.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @ZackerySpytz for the PR, and @Haypo for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 2.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @ZackerySpytz for the PR, and @Haypo for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.6.
🐍🍒⛏🤖 I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-4308 is a backport of this pull request to the 2.7 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2017
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2017
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-4309 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch.

vstinner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2017
vstinner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2017
@vstinner
Copy link
Member

vstinner commented Nov 7, 2017

I merged your fix @ZackerySpytz, thank you for your contribution to Python! I backported the fix to Python 2.7 and 3.6.

embray pushed a commit to embray/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2017
@ZackerySpytz ZackerySpytz deleted the trivial_msi_leak branch December 19, 2017 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants