Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-19561: Remove unnecessary gethostname() prototype for Solaris #23208

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kulikjak
Copy link
Contributor

@kulikjak kulikjak commented Nov 9, 2020

This is no longer necessary because Solaris included gethostname() in its header files more than 15 years ago.

https://bugs.python.org/issue19561

Copy link
Contributor

@jstasiak jstasiak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just tested this on OpenIndiana, works fine.

@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Dec 16, 2020
@kulikjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

I cannot remove the stale label, but I am still very interested in this being merged.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Dec 17, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Jan 16, 2021
@kulikjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Still relevant...

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Jan 17, 2021
@kulikjak kulikjak force-pushed the fix-gethostname-declaration branch 3 times, most recently from 3f551bd to d650b0c Compare August 23, 2022 12:03
@arhadthedev
Copy link
Member

@jcea (as an OpenSolaris expert)

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

vstinner commented Sep 2, 2023

I proposed PR #108817 with more details on the issue.

@kulikjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

kulikjak commented Sep 3, 2023

Fixed with #108817.

@kulikjak kulikjak closed this Sep 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants