Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.7] bpo-39503: CVE-2020-8492: Fix AbstractBasicAuthHandler (GH-18284) #19292

Closed

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Apr 2, 2020

The AbstractBasicAuthHandler class of the urllib.request module uses
an inefficient regular expression which can be exploited by an
attacker to cause a denial of service. Fix the regex to prevent the
catastrophic backtracking. Vulnerability reported by Ben Caller
and Matt Schwager.

AbstractBasicAuthHandler of urllib.request now parses all
WWW-Authenticate HTTP headers and accepts multiple challenges per
header: use the realm of the first Basic challenge.

Co-Authored-By: Serhiy Storchaka [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 0b297d4)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue39503

The AbstractBasicAuthHandler class of the urllib.request module uses
an inefficient regular expression which can be exploited by an
attacker to cause a denial of service. Fix the regex to prevent the
catastrophic backtracking. Vulnerability reported by Ben Caller
and Matt Schwager.

AbstractBasicAuthHandler of urllib.request now parses all
WWW-Authenticate HTTP headers and accepts multiple challenges per
header: use the realm of the first Basic challenge.

Co-Authored-By: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 0b297d4)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vstinner: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@vstinner vstinner closed this Apr 2, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-0b297d4-3.7 branch April 2, 2020 01:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants