Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-29798: Handle git worktree in patchcheck #1058

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2017

Conversation

ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor

@ncoghlan ncoghlan commented Apr 9, 2017

The original attempted fix missed an isdir() call in
get_base_branch().

The original attempted fix missed an `isdir()` call in
`get_base_branch()`.
@mention-bot
Copy link

@ncoghlan, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @birkenfeld, @tiran and @merwok to be potential reviewers.

@ncoghlan ncoghlan merged commit 2abfdf5 into python:master Apr 9, 2017
ncoghlan added a commit to ncoghlan/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2017
The original attempted fix missed an `isdir()` call in
`get_base_branch()`.
(cherry picked from commit 2abfdf5)
ncoghlan added a commit to ncoghlan/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2017
The original attempted fix missed an `isdir()` call in
`get_base_branch()`.
(cherry picked from commit 2abfdf5)
@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncoghlan commented Apr 9, 2017

3.6: #1060
3.5: #1059

@ncoghlan ncoghlan changed the title Issue #29798: Handle git worktree in patchcheck bpo-29798: Handle git worktree in patchcheck Apr 9, 2017
ncoghlan added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2017
The original attempted fix missed an `isdir()` call in
`get_base_branch()`.
(cherry picked from commit 2abfdf5)
@ncoghlan ncoghlan deleted the bpo-29798-git-worktree-patchcheck branch April 9, 2017 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants