Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

introduce a built-in default implementation for a connect-middleware #12

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 27, 2016
Merged

Conversation

osherx
Copy link
Contributor

@osherx osherx commented Jul 30, 2015

lets not ask everybody to copy-paste this middleware code...

lets use a factory pattern to let users customise the middleware (and as a container for any future settings we may think to feature

@osherx
Copy link
Contributor Author

osherx commented Jul 30, 2015

if you decide to merge it - it would be nice if you could tell us when it's published, so we can bump the dependency version and use the built-in m/w :)

@pbojinov
Copy link
Owner

@osherx this is great, I definitely like the middleware implementation and will merge it. I'll take a look and let you know when I bump the version.

pbojinov added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2016
introduce a built-in default implementation for a connect-middleware
@pbojinov pbojinov merged commit 4818756 into pbojinov:master Jan 27, 2016
@pbojinov
Copy link
Owner

@osherx sorry for the delay, it's good to go. Thank you for you help!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants