Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
jbd2: use a better hash function for the revoke table
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The old hash function didn't work well for 64-bit block numbers, and
used undefined (negative) shift right behavior.  Use the generic
64-bit hash function instead.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Andrey Ryabinin <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
tytso committed Oct 30, 2014
1 parent a41537e commit d48458d
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 8 deletions.
10 changes: 2 additions & 8 deletions fs/jbd2/revoke.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/bio.h>
#include <linux/log2.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
#endif

static struct kmem_cache *jbd2_revoke_record_cache;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -130,16 +131,9 @@ static void flush_descriptor(journal_t *, struct buffer_head *, int, int);

/* Utility functions to maintain the revoke table */

/* Borrowed from buffer.c: this is a tried and tested block hash function */
static inline int hash(journal_t *journal, unsigned long long block)
{
struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *table = journal->j_revoke;
int hash_shift = table->hash_shift;
int hash = (int)block ^ (int)((block >> 31) >> 1);

return ((hash << (hash_shift - 6)) ^
(hash >> 13) ^
(hash << (hash_shift - 12))) & (table->hash_size - 1);
return hash_64(block, journal->j_revoke->hash_shift);
}

static int insert_revoke_hash(journal_t *journal, unsigned long long blocknr,
Expand Down

0 comments on commit d48458d

Please sign in to comment.