Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
perf/x86: Fix smp_processor_id()-in-preemptible warnings
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
[ Upstream commit f73cefa ]

The following bug was triggered on a system built with
CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y:

 # echo p > /proc/sysrq-trigger

 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sh/117
 caller is perf_event_print_debug+0x1a/0x4c0
 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.11.0-rc1 torvalds#109
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x4f/0x60
  check_preemption_disabled+0xc8/0xd0
  perf_event_print_debug+0x1a/0x4c0
  __handle_sysrq+0x140/0x180
  write_sysrq_trigger+0x61/0x70
  proc_reg_write+0x4e/0x70
  vfs_write+0xd0/0x430
  ? handle_mm_fault+0xc8/0x240
  ksys_write+0x9c/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x96/0x190
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

This is because the commit d4b294b ("perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support
for counters") took smp_processor_id() outside the irq critical section.
If a preemption occurs in perf_event_print_debug() and the task is
migrated to another cpu, we may get incorrect pmu debug information.
Move smp_processor_id() back inside the irq critical section to fix this
issue.

Fixes: d4b294b ("perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for counters")
Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <[email protected]>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
Li Huafei authored and gregkh committed Aug 14, 2024
1 parent a9d6d46 commit 0c7c3dc
Showing 1 changed file with 12 additions and 10 deletions.
22 changes: 12 additions & 10 deletions arch/x86/events/core.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1521,20 +1521,23 @@ static void x86_pmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
void perf_event_print_debug(void)
{
u64 ctrl, status, overflow, pmc_ctrl, pmc_count, prev_left, fixed;
unsigned long *cntr_mask, *fixed_cntr_mask;
struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints;
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
u64 pebs, debugctl;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
unsigned long *cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, cntr_mask);
unsigned long *fixed_cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, fixed_cntr_mask);
struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, pebs_constraints);
unsigned long flags;
int idx;
int cpu, idx;

guard(irqsave)();

cpu = smp_processor_id();
cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, cntr_mask);
fixed_cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, fixed_cntr_mask);
pebs_constraints = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, pebs_constraints);

if (!*(u64 *)cntr_mask)
return;

local_irq_save(flags);

if (x86_pmu.version >= 2) {
rdmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, ctrl);
rdmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS, status);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1578,7 +1581,6 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
pr_info("CPU#%d: fixed-PMC%d count: %016llx\n",
cpu, idx, pmc_count);
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
}

void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 0c7c3dc

Please sign in to comment.