fix: Duplicate request methods in DokanTestCase class

[mralaminahamed]

All Submissions:

• My code follow the WordPress' coding standards
• My code satisfies feature requirements
• My code is tested
• My code passes the PHPCS tests
• My code has proper inline documentation
• I've included related pull request(s) (optional)
• I've included developer documentation (optional)
• I've added proper labels to this pull request

Changes proposed in this Pull Request:

Related Pull Request(s)

• Full PR Link

Closes

• Closes #

How to test the changes in this Pull Request:

• Steps or issue link

Changelog entry

Title

Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.

Before Changes

Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).

After Changes

Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).

Feature Video (optional)

Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.

PR Self Review Checklist:

• Code is not following code style guidelines
• Bad naming: make sure you would understand your code if you read it a few months from now.
• KISS: Keep it simple, Sweetie (not stupid!).
• DRY: Don't Repeat Yourself.
• Code that is not readable: too many nested 'if's are a bad sign.
• Performance issues
• Complicated constructions that need refactoring or comments: code should almost always be self-explanatory.
• Grammar errors.

FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:

As a reviewer, your feedback should be focused on the idea, not the person. Seek to understand, be respectful, and focus on constructive dialog.

As a contributor, your responsibility is to learn from suggestions and iterate your pull request should it be needed based on feedback. Seek to collaborate and produce the best possible contribution to the greater whole.

• Correct — Does the change do what it’s supposed to? ie: code 100% fulfilling the requirements?
• Secure — Would a nefarious party find some way to exploit this change? ie: everything is sanitized/escaped appropriately for any SQL or XSS injection possibilities?
• Readable — Will your future self be able to understand this change months down the road?
• Elegant — Does the change fit aesthetically within the overall style and architecture?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Removed deprecated methods for handling HTTP DELETE and PUT requests in the testing framework, streamlining test case functionality.

• Chores

  • Cleaned up the codebase by eliminating unused methods that may have caused confusion in API interaction tests.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes involve the removal of two protected methods, delete_request and put_request, from the DokanTestCase class. These methods were used to facilitate HTTP DELETE and PUT requests within the test cases. Their removal impacts the functionality of the class, specifically affecting the ability to simulate API interactions through these request types.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
tests/php/src/DokanTestCase.php	Removed protected methods delete_request and put_request from the DokanTestCase class.

Poem

In the garden where bunnies play,
Two methods hopped away today.
No more DELETE or PUT in sight,
Just fluffy clouds and soft moonlight.
We’ll find new ways to test and cheer,
For change brings joy, let’s spread the cheer! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d91d51e and bd4c36c.

Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/php/src/DokanTestCase.php (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (3)

tests/php/src/DokanTestCase.php (3)

Line range hint 1-1: Approve setup and teardown methods.

The set_up and tear_down methods are well-implemented, ensuring proper setup and cleanup of the test environment. This includes handling of the REST server and user setup, which is crucial for the integrity of the tests.

---

Line range hint 1-1: Assess the impact of removing delete_request and put_request.

The removal of these methods eliminates direct support for DELETE and PUT HTTP requests within the DokanTestCase class. This change could potentially impact tests that rely on these methods for simulating API interactions.

Verification successful

---

Removal of delete_request and put_request does not impact the test suite

The delete_request and put_request methods are not used outside the DokanTestCase.php file. Their removal does not affect other parts of the test suite, aligning with the PR's objective to eliminate redundancy.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if `delete_request` and `put_request` are used elsewhere in the test suite.

# Test: Search for the usage of `delete_request` and `put_request`. Expect: No occurrences outside this class.
rg --type php -A 5 $'delete_request'
rg --type php -A 5 $'put_request'

Length of output: 1218

---

Line range hint 1-1: Verify and potentially improve remaining request methods.

While the get_request and post_request methods are implemented, it's important to ensure they are used consistently and correctly throughout the test suite. Additionally, consider refactoring these methods to improve code reuse and maintainability.

Consider abstracting common functionality in get_request and post_request into a separate method to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.