Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a fail test #2328

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024
Merged

Fix a fail test #2328

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

shashwatahalder01
Copy link
Contributor

@shashwatahalder01 shashwatahalder01 commented Aug 7, 2024

All Submissions:

  • My code follow the WordPress' coding standards
  • My code satisfies feature requirements
  • My code is tested
  • My code passes the PHPCS tests
  • My code has proper inline documentation
  • I've included related pull request(s) (optional)
  • I've included developer documentation (optional)
  • I've added proper labels to this pull request

Changes proposed in this Pull Request:

Related Pull Request(s)

  • Full PR Link

Closes

  • Closes #

How to test the changes in this Pull Request:

  • Steps or issue link

Changelog entry

Title

Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.

Before Changes

Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).

After Changes

Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).

Feature Video (optional)

Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.

PR Self Review Checklist:

  • Code is not following code style guidelines
  • Bad naming: make sure you would understand your code if you read it a few months from now.
  • KISS: Keep it simple, Sweetie (not stupid!).
  • DRY: Don't Repeat Yourself.
  • Code that is not readable: too many nested 'if's are a bad sign.
  • Performance issues
  • Complicated constructions that need refactoring or comments: code should almost always be self-explanatory.
  • Grammar errors.

FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:

As a reviewer, your feedback should be focused on the idea, not the person. Seek to understand, be respectful, and focus on constructive dialog.

As a contributor, your responsibility is to learn from suggestions and iterate your pull request should it be needed based on feedback. Seek to collaborate and produce the best possible contribution to the greater whole.

  • Correct — Does the change do what it’s supposed to? ie: code 100% fulfilling the requirements?
  • Secure — Would a nefarious party find some way to exploit this change? ie: everything is sanitized/escaped appropriately for any SQL or XSS injection possibilities?
  • Readable — Will your future self be able to understand this change months down the road?
  • Elegant — Does the change fit aesthetically within the overall style and architecture?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Disabled the display of debug messages on the front end, improving user experience during normal operations.
    • Re-enabled the test case for viewing the customer migration form, allowing for validation of its functionality.
  • Refactor

    • Updated the XPath selector for the "Publish" button to reflect changes in the application’s HTML structure.

@shashwatahalder01 shashwatahalder01 self-assigned this Aug 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 7, 2024

Walkthrough

This update includes several key changes across multiple files. The .wp-env.json configuration file has adjusted the WP_DEBUG_DISPLAY setting to improve user experience by hiding debug messages. The selector for the "Publish" button in selectors.ts has been updated to reflect changes in the HTML structure, while the test suite in shortcodes.spec.ts has resumed execution of a previously skipped test case, enhancing overall test coverage and reliability.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/pw/.wp-env.json Changed WP_DEBUG_DISPLAY from true to false to prevent debug messages from displaying.
tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts Updated XPath for "Publish" button from edit-post-header__settings to editor-header__settings.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/shortcodes.spec.ts Removed skip directive from the test for customer migration form, allowing it to run and validate.

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code where the bunnies play,
Debugging is hushed, no errors to sway.
With a click of "Publish," the magic unfolds,
Tests now dance freely, their stories retold.
Hooray for the changes, let joy be our guide,
As we hop through the updates, with cheer and with pride! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 701cd08 and 8a75933.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • tests/pw/.wp-env.json (1 hunks)
  • tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/pw/tests/e2e/shortcodes.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/pw/.wp-env.json (1)

13-13: Change in debug display setting.

The WP_DEBUG_DISPLAY setting has been changed from true to false. This will prevent debug messages from being displayed on the front end, which can enhance the user experience by hiding potentially confusing debug information from end users. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended debugging and user experience goals.

tests/pw/tests/e2e/shortcodes.spec.ts (1)

Line range hint 67-67:
Re-enabled test for customer migration form.

The test.skip directive has been removed, re-enabling the test for the customer migration form. Ensure that the underlying issue that caused the test to be skipped has been resolved and that the test now passes reliably.

tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (1)

163-163: LGTM! Verify the accuracy of the updated selector.

The XPath expression for the "Publish" button has been updated to match the new HTML structure. Ensure that this change is consistent with the updated HTML and verify its accuracy in the codebase.

Verification successful

Verification successful.

The XPath expression for the "Publish" button has been correctly updated to match the new HTML structure.

  • tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts: The updated selector editor-header__settings is present and used correctly.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the accuracy of the updated XPath expression for the "Publish" button.

# Test: Search for the usage of the updated selector. Expect: Only occurrences of the updated selector.
rg --type javascript --type typescript -A 5 $'editor-header__settings'

Length of output: 104


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the accuracy of the updated XPath expression for the "Publish" button.

# Test: Search for the usage of the updated selector. Expect: Only occurrences of the updated selector.
rg --type js --type ts -A 5 $'editor-header__settings'

Length of output: 549

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8a75933 and 97430aa.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/pw/tests/e2e/shortcodes.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/pw/tests/e2e/shortcodes.spec.ts

@shashwatahalder01 shashwatahalder01 added the QA approved This PR is approved by the QA team label Aug 7, 2024
@shashwatahalder01 shashwatahalder01 merged commit 50167b9 into develop Aug 7, 2024
2 checks passed
@shashwatahalder01 shashwatahalder01 deleted the fix/shortcode branch August 19, 2024 04:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
QA approved This PR is approved by the QA team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant