Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
bpo-29894: Deprecate returning an instance of complex subclass from _…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…_complex__. (python#798)

In a future versions of Python this can be an error.
  • Loading branch information
serhiy-storchaka authored Mar 24, 2017
1 parent af7b9ec commit 671079e
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 28 additions and 13 deletions.
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions Lib/test/test_complex.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -383,8 +383,9 @@ class complex2(complex):
def __complex__(self):
return None

self.assertAlmostEqual(complex(complex0(1j)), 42j)
self.assertAlmostEqual(complex(complex1(1j)), 2j)
self.assertEqual(complex(complex0(1j)), 42j)
with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning):
self.assertEqual(complex(complex1(1j)), 2j)
self.assertRaises(TypeError, complex, complex2(1j))

@support.requires_IEEE_754
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion Lib/test/test_getargs2.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -408,7 +408,8 @@ def test_D(self):
self.assertEqual(getargs_D(ComplexSubclass(7.5+0.25j)), 7.5+0.25j)
self.assertEqual(getargs_D(ComplexSubclass2(7.5+0.25j)), 7.5+0.25j)
self.assertRaises(TypeError, getargs_D, BadComplex())
self.assertEqual(getargs_D(BadComplex2()), 4.25+0.5j)
with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning):
self.assertEqual(getargs_D(BadComplex2()), 4.25+0.5j)
self.assertEqual(getargs_D(BadComplex3(7.5+0.25j)), 7.5+0.25j)

for x in (DBL_MIN, -DBL_MIN, DBL_MAX, -DBL_MAX, INF, -INF):
Expand Down
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions Misc/NEWS
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ What's New in Python 3.7.0 alpha 1?
Core and Builtins
-----------------

- bpo-29894: The deprecation warning is emitted if __complex__ returns an
instance of a strict subclass of complex. In a future versions of Python
this can be an error.

- bpo-29859: Show correct error messages when any of the pthread_* calls in
thread_pthread.h fails.

Expand Down
29 changes: 19 additions & 10 deletions Objects/complexobject.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -274,17 +274,31 @@ PyComplex_ImagAsDouble(PyObject *op)
}

static PyObject *
try_complex_special_method(PyObject *op) {
try_complex_special_method(PyObject *op)
{
PyObject *f;
_Py_IDENTIFIER(__complex__);

f = _PyObject_LookupSpecial(op, &PyId___complex__);
if (f) {
PyObject *res = _PyObject_CallNoArg(f);
Py_DECREF(f);
if (res != NULL && !PyComplex_Check(res)) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError,
"__complex__ should return a complex object");
if (!res || PyComplex_CheckExact(res)) {
return res;
}
if (!PyComplex_Check(res)) {
PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError,
"__complex__ returned non-complex (type %.200s)",
res->ob_type->tp_name);
Py_DECREF(res);
return NULL;
}
/* Issue #29894: warn if 'res' not of exact type complex. */
if (PyErr_WarnFormat(PyExc_DeprecationWarning, 1,
"__complex__ returned non-complex (type %.200s). "
"The ability to return an instance of a strict subclass of complex "
"is deprecated, and may be removed in a future version of Python.",
res->ob_type->tp_name)) {
Py_DECREF(res);
return NULL;
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1030,12 +1044,7 @@ complex_new_impl(PyTypeObject *type, PyObject *r, PyObject *i)
}
if (tmp == NULL)
return NULL;
if (!PyFloat_Check(tmp)) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError,
"float(r) didn't return a float");
Py_DECREF(tmp);
return NULL;
}
assert(PyFloat_Check(tmp));
cr.real = PyFloat_AsDouble(tmp);
cr.imag = 0.0;
Py_DECREF(tmp);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 671079e

Please sign in to comment.