Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Always predict for status quo features trial index #2810

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

danielcohenlive
Copy link

Summary:
Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

Differential Revision: D63715134

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Oct 2, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
Summary:

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

Differential Revision: D63715134
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#2810

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

Differential Revision: D63715134
danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
Summary:

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

Differential Revision: D63715134
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#2810

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

Differential Revision: D63715134
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.72%. Comparing base (4422ada) to head (97598bc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2810   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.72%   95.72%           
=======================================
  Files         492      492           
  Lines       48566    48573    +7     
=======================================
+ Hits        46489    46496    +7     
  Misses       2077     2077           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
Summary:

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

Differential Revision: D63715134
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
Summary:

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

Differential Revision: D63715134
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Summary:

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

Differential Revision: D63715134
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#2810

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

Differential Revision: D63715134
danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#2810

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

Differential Revision: D63715134
danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Summary:

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

##What's happening 
Because of nonstationarity, the same feature gets predicted differently in different trials.  But the point of this plot is to show how well the parameterization does on the metric, so we want to standardize the trial index we're predicting on.

Reviewed By: mgarrard

Differential Revision: D63715134
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Summary:

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

##What's happening 
Because of nonstationarity, the same feature gets predicted differently in different trials.  But the point of this plot is to show how well the parameterization does on the metric, so we want to standardize the trial index we're predicting on.

Reviewed By: mgarrard

Differential Revision: D63715134
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Summary:

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

##What's happening 
Because of nonstationarity, the same feature gets predicted differently in different trials.  But the point of this plot is to show how well the parameterization does on the metric, so we want to standardize the trial index we're predicting on.

Reviewed By: mgarrard

Differential Revision: D63715134
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

Summary:

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

##What's happening 
Because of nonstationarity, the same feature gets predicted differently in different trials.  But the point of this plot is to show how well the parameterization does on the metric, so we want to standardize the trial index we're predicting on.

Reviewed By: mgarrard

Differential Revision: D63715134
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63715134

danielcohenlive pushed a commit to danielcohenlive/Ax-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#2810

Previously we had plots that looked like {F1904605463}
After the same plot looks like
{F1904608806}

##What's happening
Because of nonstationarity, the same feature gets predicted differently in different trials.  But the point of this plot is to show how well the parameterization does on the metric, so we want to standardize the trial index we're predicting on.

Differential Revision: D63715134

Reviewed By: mgarrard
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants