Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EIP-6404: rm chain_id from txs wrapper #6665

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2023

Conversation

etan-status
Copy link
Contributor

Chain ID is already mixed into each transaction signature, no need to replicate it as part of the transactions list.

Chain ID is already mixed into each transaction signature, no need to
replicate it as part of the transactions list.
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core labels Mar 9, 2023
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Mar 9, 2023

All reviewers have approved. Auto merging...

@eth-bot eth-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) March 9, 2023 12:23
@eth-bot eth-bot merged commit 31ecd85 into ethereum:master Mar 9, 2023
@etan-status etan-status deleted the tx-rmchain branch March 9, 2023 12:49
fulldecent pushed a commit to fulldecent/EIPs that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
Chain ID is already mixed into each transaction signature, no need to
replicate it as part of the transactions list.
axelcabee pushed a commit to axelcabee/EIPs that referenced this pull request May 6, 2023
Chain ID is already mixed into each transaction signature, no need to
replicate it as part of the transactions list.
GAEAlimited pushed a commit to GAEAlimited/EIPs that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
Chain ID is already mixed into each transaction signature, no need to
replicate it as part of the transactions list.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants