Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[jvm-packages] a better explanation about the inconsistent issue #3524

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 29, 2018

Conversation

CodingCat
Copy link
Member

looks like some users still confused about the explanation here

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3524 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #3524   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     45.64%   45.64%           
  Complexity      188      188           
=========================================
  Files           166      166           
  Lines         13219    13219           
  Branches        445      445           
=========================================
  Hits           6034     6034           
  Misses         6981     6981           
  Partials        204      204

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8973f2c...e9c8acf. Read the comment docs.

@CodingCat CodingCat merged commit b5178d3 into master Jul 29, 2018
@CodingCat CodingCat deleted the CodingCat-patch-1 branch July 29, 2018 00:34
hcho3 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2018
* Clarify behavior of LIBSVM in XGBoost4J-Spark (#3524)
* Fix typo in faq.rst (#3521)
* Fix typo in parameter.rst, gblinear section (#3518)
* Clarify supported OSes for XGBoost4J published JARs (#3547)
* Update broken links (#3565)
* Grammar fixes and typos (#3568)
* Bring XGBoost4J Intro up-to-date (#3574)
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 27, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants