-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 580
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
code hygiene: using host functions instead of constructing manually #3219
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice cleanup!
Looks like some tests are failing |
clientPrefix := []byte(fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s/", host.KeyClientStorePrefix, clientID)) | ||
clientPrefix := host.PrefixedClientStoreKey([]byte(clientID)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
seems like these are not quite the same, there's a trailing slash here but not in host.PrefixedClientStoreKey()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahhh, yeah! I will revert then, but I wonder then why that trailing slash is needed there.. 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not 100% as I didn't look super deep into it. I tried adding the trailing slash to PrefixedClientStorePath but had failing tests elsewhere.
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3219 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.54% 78.54%
=======================================
Files 181 181
Lines 12580 12580
=======================================
Hits 9881 9881
Misses 2262 2262
Partials 437 437
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK, I think we can remove the backport label since this is code-hygiene?
Description
closes: #XXXX
Commit Message / Changelog Entry
N/A
see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
) or specification (x/<module>/spec/
).godoc
comments.Files changed
in the Github PR explorer.Codecov Report
in the comment section below once CI passes.