docs: update contributing link #22103
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces comprehensive updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
CONTRIBUTING.md (3)
Line range hint
126-138: Enhanced development procedure guidelinesThe refinements to the "Development Procedure" section provide clearer instructions for contributors, particularly the emphasis on running
make lint testbefore submitting pull requests. This should lead to higher quality initial submissions and a more efficient review process.Consider adding a note about the importance of keeping commits atomic and writing clear commit messages, as this can further improve the quality of contributions and ease the review process.
Line range hint
140-158: Comprehensive pull request submission guidelinesThe expanded "Pull Requests" section now provides a more detailed guide for contributors, including the use of draft PRs for early feedback and the requirement for changelog entries. These additions will help ensure more consistent and well-prepared pull requests.
Consider adding a note about the importance of keeping PRs focused on a single issue or feature, as this can make the review process more manageable and increase the likelihood of timely merges.
Line range hint
160-245: Clarified pull request accountability and review criteriaThe expanded "Pull Request Accountability" section provides clear expectations for both PR owners and reviewers. The detailed criteria for code quality, functionality, testing, documentation, and performance will contribute to a more thorough and efficient review process.
Consider adding a note about the importance of timely responses from both PR owners and reviewers to keep the process moving smoothly. This could include guidelines on how often to check for and respond to feedback.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
🔇 Additional comments (3)
CONTRIBUTING.md (3)
Line range hint
1-24: Improved document structure with expanded table of contentsThe expansion of the table of contents enhances the document's navigability, making it easier for contributors to find relevant information quickly.
Line range hint
1-275: Overall improvement to contribution guidelinesThe changes to the CONTRIBUTING.md file significantly enhance the clarity and comprehensiveness of the contribution guidelines for the Cosmos SDK project. The expanded table of contents, updated external links, refined development procedures, detailed pull request guidelines, and clarified accountability expectations all contribute to a more robust and user-friendly contribution process.
These improvements should lead to:
- Higher quality initial contributions
- More efficient review processes
- Clearer expectations for all parties involved in the development process
The minor suggestions provided in the review comments, if implemented, would further refine these guidelines.
273-275: Updated external links for Protocol Buffers and Docker installationThe links for Protocol Buffers and Docker installation have been updated to their current URLs. This ensures that contributors are directed to the most up-to-date resources.
✅ Verification successful
External links for Protocol Buffers and Docker installation are valid
The updated links to Protocol Buffers and Docker installation are accessible and correctly configured.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the updated links are accessible curl -sS --head https://protobuf.dev > /dev/null && echo "Protocol Buffers link is valid" || echo "Protocol Buffers link is invalid" curl -sS --head https://docs.docker.com/get-started/get-docker/ > /dev/null && echo "Docker installation link is valid" || echo "Docker installation link is invalid"Length of output: 252
Description
update contributing link
Summary by CodeRabbit