Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use BMSR_ANEGCOMPLETE bit for filling an_complete
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Commit ede359d ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Link in pcs_get_state() if AN
is bypassed") added the ability to link if AN was bypassed, and added
filling of state->an_complete field, but set it to true if AN was
enabled in BMCR, not when AN was reported complete in BMSR.

This was done because for some reason, when I wanted to use BMSR value
to infer an_complete, I was looking at BMSR_ANEGCAPABLE bit (which was
always 1), instead of BMSR_ANEGCOMPLETE bit.

Use BMSR_ANEGCOMPLETE for filling state->an_complete.

Fixes: ede359d ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Link in pcs_get_state() if AN is bypassed")
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
elkablo authored and kuba-moo committed Jun 9, 2022
1 parent 11ec18b commit 47e9693
Showing 1 changed file with 11 additions and 16 deletions.
27 changes: 11 additions & 16 deletions drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -50,22 +50,17 @@ static int mv88e6390_serdes_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
}

static int mv88e6xxx_serdes_pcs_get_state(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
u16 ctrl, u16 status, u16 lpa,
u16 bmsr, u16 lpa, u16 status,
struct phylink_link_state *state)
{
state->link = !!(status & MV88E6390_SGMII_PHY_STATUS_LINK);
state->an_complete = !!(bmsr & BMSR_ANEGCOMPLETE);

if (status & MV88E6390_SGMII_PHY_STATUS_SPD_DPL_VALID) {
/* The Spped and Duplex Resolved register is 1 if AN is enabled
* and complete, or if AN is disabled. So with disabled AN we
* still get here on link up. But we want to set an_complete
* only if AN was enabled, thus we look at BMCR_ANENABLE.
* (According to 802.3-2008 section 22.2.4.2.10, we should be
* able to get this same value from BMSR_ANEGCAPABLE, but tests
* show that these Marvell PHYs don't conform to this part of
* the specificaion - BMSR_ANEGCAPABLE is simply always 1.)
* still get here on link up.
*/
state->an_complete = !!(ctrl & BMCR_ANENABLE);
state->duplex = status &
MV88E6390_SGMII_PHY_STATUS_DUPLEX_FULL ?
DUPLEX_FULL : DUPLEX_HALF;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -191,12 +186,12 @@ int mv88e6352_serdes_pcs_config(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
int mv88e6352_serdes_pcs_get_state(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
int lane, struct phylink_link_state *state)
{
u16 lpa, status, ctrl;
u16 bmsr, lpa, status;
int err;

err = mv88e6352_serdes_read(chip, MII_BMCR, &ctrl);
err = mv88e6352_serdes_read(chip, MII_BMSR, &bmsr);
if (err) {
dev_err(chip->dev, "can't read Serdes PHY control: %d\n", err);
dev_err(chip->dev, "can't read Serdes BMSR: %d\n", err);
return err;
}

Expand All @@ -212,7 +207,7 @@ int mv88e6352_serdes_pcs_get_state(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
return err;
}

return mv88e6xxx_serdes_pcs_get_state(chip, ctrl, status, lpa, state);
return mv88e6xxx_serdes_pcs_get_state(chip, bmsr, lpa, status, state);
}

int mv88e6352_serdes_pcs_an_restart(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -918,13 +913,13 @@ int mv88e6390_serdes_pcs_config(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
static int mv88e6390_serdes_pcs_get_state_sgmii(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
int port, int lane, struct phylink_link_state *state)
{
u16 lpa, status, ctrl;
u16 bmsr, lpa, status;
int err;

err = mv88e6390_serdes_read(chip, lane, MDIO_MMD_PHYXS,
MV88E6390_SGMII_BMCR, &ctrl);
MV88E6390_SGMII_BMSR, &bmsr);
if (err) {
dev_err(chip->dev, "can't read Serdes PHY control: %d\n", err);
dev_err(chip->dev, "can't read Serdes PHY BMSR: %d\n", err);
return err;
}

Expand All @@ -942,7 +937,7 @@ static int mv88e6390_serdes_pcs_get_state_sgmii(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
return err;
}

return mv88e6xxx_serdes_pcs_get_state(chip, ctrl, status, lpa, state);
return mv88e6xxx_serdes_pcs_get_state(chip, bmsr, lpa, status, state);
}

static int mv88e6390_serdes_pcs_get_state_10g(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 47e9693

Please sign in to comment.