bpf: Add _kernel suffix to internal lockdown_bpf_read

Rename LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ into LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL so we have naming more consistent with a LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER option that we are adding. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
chewitt · Aug 9, 2021 · 7133084 · 7133084
1 parent d09c548
commit 7133084
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 4 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions.
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ enum lockdown_reason {
 	LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX,
 	LOCKDOWN_KCORE,
 	LOCKDOWN_KPROBES,
-	LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ,
+	LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL,
 	LOCKDOWN_PERF,
 	LOCKDOWN_TRACEFS,
 	LOCKDOWN_XMON_RW,

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -1070,12 +1070,12 @@ bpf_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user:
 		return &bpf_probe_read_user_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel:
-		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ?
+		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ?
 		       NULL : &bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user_str:
 		return &bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel_str:
-		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ?
+		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ?
 		       NULL : &bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_snprintf_btf:
 		return &bpf_snprintf_btf_proto;

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -999,19 +999,19 @@ bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user:
 		return &bpf_probe_read_user_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel:
-		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ?
+		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ?
 		       NULL : &bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user_str:
 		return &bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel_str:
-		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ?
+		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ?
 		       NULL : &bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto;
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read:
-		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ?
+		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ?
 		       NULL : &bpf_probe_read_compat_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_str:
-		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ?
+		return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ?
 		       NULL : &bpf_probe_read_compat_str_proto;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS

diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ const char *const lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX+1] = {
 	[LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX] = "integrity",
 	[LOCKDOWN_KCORE] = "/proc/kcore access",
 	[LOCKDOWN_KPROBES] = "use of kprobes",
-	[LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ] = "use of bpf to read kernel RAM",
+	[LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL] = "use of bpf to read kernel RAM",
 	[LOCKDOWN_PERF] = "unsafe use of perf",
 	[LOCKDOWN_TRACEFS] = "use of tracefs",
 	[LOCKDOWN_XMON_RW] = "xmon read and write access",