Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes to evalEER #579

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2021
Merged

Changes to evalEER #579

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2021

Conversation

JordanCheney
Copy link
Contributor

This PR makes 2 changes to evalEER and adds a new, corresponding, plotEER method. The C API and command line tool are updated to support the new function.

Changes are:

  1. Change how operating points are computed to mirror eval (i.e. operating points are added only if both the true positive AND false positive count changes). This fixes a bug where successive operating points could have the same FAR, which caused nan results in the output.

  2. Change the optional pdf argument to a CSV argument (again mirroring eval) so that results are written as CSVs and can be combined to show multiple results on the same plot

…tEER method. The C API and command line tool

are updated to support the new function.

Changes are:

1. Change how operating points are computed to mirror eval (i.e. operating points are added only if both the true positive AND false positive count changes). This fixes a bug where successive operating points could have the same FAR, which caused nan results in the output.

2. Change the optional pdf argument to a CSV argument (again mirroring eval) so that results are written as CSVs and can be combined to show multiple results on the same plot
@bhklein
Copy link
Member

bhklein commented Jan 25, 2021

looks good!

@bhklein bhklein merged commit 59a1e3c into master Jan 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants