Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(transitions): move berad transitions stuff around #1881

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 11, 2024

Conversation

ocnc
Copy link
Contributor

@ocnc ocnc commented Aug 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new method for processing various operations within the state processor, enhancing functionality beyond just deposits.
    • Improved clarity of the processing logic with updated comments reflecting the broader scope of operation handling.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed legacy function that previously managed deposit processing, suggesting a more efficient approach to state management.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined the state processing workflow by consolidating functions, improving maintainability and clarity.

@ocnc ocnc requested a review from itsdevbear as a code owner August 11, 2024 04:51
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the StateProcessor functionality within the beacon chain's state management. By broadening the scope from processing only deposits to handling various operations, the updates improve the overall flexibility and maintainability of the code. The introduction of the new processOperations method allows for better integration of different operation types, while the removal of the redundant processOperations from state_processor_staking.go streamlines the deposit processing logic.

Changes

Files Change Summary
examples/berad/pkg/state-transition/... Introduced processOperations method in state_processor.go for broader operation handling. Removed the old processOperations in state_processor_staking.go, consolidating deposit processing to enhance clarity and maintainability.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant SP as StateProcessor
    participant BS as BeaconState
    participant BB as BeaconBlock

    SP->>BS: Retrieve current state
    SP->>BB: Process operations from block
    alt Processing Deposits
        SP->>SP: processDeposits(deposit)
    end
    alt Future Enhancements
        SP->>SP: processAttestations(attestation)
    end
Loading

Poem

In the world of code, we hop and play,
With deposits and blocks, we find our way.
A method new, with operations grand,
Enhancing our state, just as we planned.
So let’s leap with joy, our tasks now refined,
In the rhythm of code, new treasures we find! 🐇✨


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ocnc ocnc enabled auto-merge (squash) August 11, 2024 04:51
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 21.92%. Comparing base (f7e8f0d) to head (6c412d9).

Files Patch % Lines
...ples/berad/pkg/state-transition/state_processor.go 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1881      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   21.88%   21.92%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         338      338              
  Lines       15766    15737      -29     
  Branches       21       21              
==========================================
  Hits         3450     3450              
+ Misses      12199    12170      -29     
  Partials      117      117              
Files Coverage Δ
...ad/pkg/state-transition/state_processor_staking.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ples/berad/pkg/state-transition/state_processor.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4dac09 and 1374d5c.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • examples/berad/pkg/state-transition/state_processor.go (2 hunks)
  • examples/berad/pkg/state-transition/state_processor_staking.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
examples/berad/pkg/state-transition/state_processor_staking.go (5)

Line range hint 11-20: LGTM!

The processDeposits function is correctly iterating over deposits and handling errors. The reduction in comments suggests a streamlined approach, which is acceptable.


Line range hint 23-35: LGTM!

The processDeposit function correctly updates the deposit index and applies the deposit. The error handling is appropriate.


Line range hint 38-54: LGTM!

The applyDeposit function correctly updates or creates a validator. The TODO comment indicates planned future enhancements.


Line range hint 57-85: LGTM!

The createValidator function includes necessary checks and error handling. The logic for handling genesis conditions is appropriate.


Line range hint 88-110: LGTM!

The addValidatorToRegistry function appropriately handles validator addition and balance updates. The TODO comment indicates a known issue to be addressed.

examples/berad/pkg/state-transition/state_processor.go (1)

433-444: LGTM!

The processOperations function processes deposits and includes a TODO for future attestation processing. This aligns with the goal of expanding operation handling.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1374d5c and 6c412d9.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/berad/pkg/state-transition/state_processor.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
examples/berad/pkg/state-transition/state_processor.go (2)

309-309: Comment Update Approved.

The updated comment clarifies that the function processes operations from the block body, not just deposits. This provides better context for the subsequent logic.


309-309: Integration of processOperations Approved.

The integration of processOperations into ProcessBlock enhances the modularity and extensibility of the block processing logic.

Comment on lines +433 to +444
// processOperations processes the operations and ensures they match the
// local state.
func (sp *StateProcessor[
BeaconBlockT, _, _, BeaconStateT, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _,
]) processOperations(
st BeaconStateT,
blk BeaconBlockT,
) error {
// TODO: process attestations as well
deposits := blk.GetBody().GetDeposits()
return sp.processDeposits(st, deposits)
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Initial Implementation of processOperations Approved.

The function currently processes deposits and includes a TODO comment for future expansion to handle attestations. The implementation is consistent with existing error handling practices.

Address the TODO Comment.

Consider prioritizing the implementation of attestation processing to enhance the functionality of processOperations.

@ocnc ocnc merged commit 0d0233f into main Aug 11, 2024
18 checks passed
@ocnc ocnc deleted the move-stuff-in-transitions-berad branch August 11, 2024 06:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants