Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add additional test for MarshalBitList #1463

Merged

Conversation

TropicalDog17
Copy link
Contributor

@TropicalDog17 TropicalDog17 commented Jun 13, 2024

Description

  • Refactor TestMarshalBitList using table-driven tests to improve maintainability.

  • Add testcase for multiple bytes input.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced TestMarshalBitList to include multiple test cases with varying input lengths. This update improves test coverage by covering scenarios like empty input, single-element input, and various edge cases.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The TestMarshalBitList function in serialization_test.go has been significantly enhanced to improve test coverage and robustness. It now utilizes a test table containing multiple scenarios like empty input, single-element input, and various input lengths, including edge cases. This restructuring introduces loops over test cases and individual subtests for each, ensuring thorough validation of the MarshalBitList function.

Changes

Files Change Summary
mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/serialization_test.go The TestMarshalBitList function has been restructured to include a test table covering a variety of scenarios such as empty, single-element, and edge cases, enhancing test comprehensiveness.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Tester
    participant MarshalBitList
    loop Test Cases
        Tester->>MarshalBitList: Feed input data
        MarshalBitList-->>Tester: Return marshalled data
        Tester->>Tester: Validate output against expectation
    end
Loading

Poem

Whiskers twitch in coder’s den,
Testing bit lists once again.
Empty, single, eight, or nine,
Every case is now just fine.
Confidence grows strong and steep,
In marshalled bits, our faith we keep. 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f72caae and e4c9e03.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/serialization_test.go (1 hunks)

mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/serialization_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4c9e03 and 5c1893a.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/serialization_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/serialization_test.go (1)

304-346: Great work on implementing table-driven tests for TestMarshalBitList. This approach not only improves maintainability but also makes it easier to add new test cases in the future.

However, to enhance the debugging experience, consider adding a descriptive failure message in the t.Errorf call. This will provide immediate context in the test output, making it easier to understand the failure without needing to look up the test case details.

-				t.Errorf("Expected output %08b, got %08b", tc.expOutput, output)
+				t.Errorf("%s: Expected output %08b, got %08b", tc.name, tc.expOutput, output)

Copy link
Contributor

@rustybera rustybera left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@nidhi-singh02 nidhi-singh02 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@rustybera rustybera enabled auto-merge June 14, 2024 16:39
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c1893a and bccba76.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/serialization_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/serialization_test.go (1)

304-353: The refactor to use table-driven tests in TestMarshalBitList enhances maintainability and test coverage. However, consider enhancing the error messages for better debugging support.

-				t.Errorf("Expected output %08b, got %08b", tc.expOutput, output)
+				t.Errorf("%s: Expected output %08b, got %08b", tc.name, tc.expOutput, output)

@rustybera rustybera added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 14, 2024
Merged via the queue into berachain:main with commit 1d4bacf Jun 14, 2024
14 checks passed
itsdevbear added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2024
Co-authored-by: itsdevbear <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Iron | B-Harvest <[email protected]>
@TropicalDog17 TropicalDog17 deleted the tuan/test-marshal-bitlist-multiplebytes branch June 15, 2024 01:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants