-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
Conversation
…d under Python 2.7 and Python 3.6 on Sagemaker.
@piiswrong @simoncorstonoliver But we referenced the network architecture of it and also method for reading configuration, |
@Soonhwan-Kwon @piiswrong if someone with expertise in ASR were to prepare some sample data that could be used with the reference network architecture then perhaps a new example tutorial could be created in the future, but for now let's remove it so it doesn't cause confusion on the web site for people who are new to MXNet. |
Doesn't the speech_recognition example work? @simoncorstonoliver |
I was not able to verify that it works. @Soonhwan-Kwon says that people with more expertise than me were eventually able to get it working after filling in the missing/vague information and training for several days so I would say no, as it stands it doesn't work. |
@piiswrong @simoncorstonoliver I'm afraid that you've confused the author who wrote the speech-demo example(maybe pluskid?). The example I've made is speech_recognition. |
* Update for MXNet 1.0. PEP8 fixes to code and misc improvements. Tested under Python 2.7 and Python 3.6 on Sagemaker. * Remove defunct tutorial page * Remove defunct demo * Remove duplicate material
* Update for MXNet 1.0. PEP8 fixes to code and misc improvements. Tested under Python 2.7 and Python 3.6 on Sagemaker. * Remove defunct tutorial page * Remove defunct demo * Remove duplicate material
I have spent ~4 hours working through the demo trying to get it working. It has problems so severe that I don’t think it’s worth trying to salvage it. This example might make a good blog entry for people who are thoroughly versed in Kaldi, an Open Source automatic speech recognition (ASR) project, and who are interested in an MXNet wrapper for it but does not stand alone as an introductory example to speech recognition suitable for inclusion in the MXNet repo. Alternatively, an ASR expert could perhaps rework this example and resubmit it if it illustrated general MXNet concepts.
Specific criticisms that lead me to propose removing the demo altogether: