Crusual bugfixes, new functionallity and some cleanup #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Vlad-00003
commented
Mar 20, 2018
| @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ public static void Patch(HarmonyInstance harmony) | |||
| Utility.PatchDictionary(CraftDataType, "harvestTypeList", customHarvestTypeList); | |||
| Utility.PatchDictionary(CraftDataType, "itemSizes", customItemSizes); | |||
| Utility.PatchDictionary(CraftDataType, "equipmentTypes", customEquipmentTypes); | |||
| Utility.PatchDictionary(CraftDataType, "groups", customGroups); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now this can be used like that (example from your BaseLightSwitch)
if(!CraftDataPatcher.customGroups.ContainsKey(TechGroup.InteriorModules))
CraftDataPatcher.customGroups.Add(TechGroup.InteriorModules, new Dictionary<TechCategory, List<TechType>>());
if(!CraftDataPatcher.customGroups[TechGroup.InteriorModules].ContainsKey(TechCategory.InteriorModule))
CraftDataPatcher.customGroups[TechGroup.InteriorModules][TechCategory.InteriorModule] = new List<TechType>();
CraftDataPatcher.customGroups[TechGroup.InteriorModules][TechCategory.InteriorModule].Add(techType);
…ing techtypes to the groups.
Vlad-00003
commented
Mar 20, 2018
|
|
||
| public static List<TechType> customBuildables = new List<TechType>(); | ||
|
|
||
| private static readonly Type CraftDataType = typeof(CraftData); | ||
|
|
||
| public static void AddToCustomGroup(TechGroup group, TechCategory category, TechType techType) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this would be easier to use. I don't know if it's necacarry to make customGroups private, but the idea is simpple - don't touch what doesn't need to be touched =)
And new usage example (once again - from your BaseLightSwitch)
CraftDataPatcher.AddToCustomGroup(TechGroup.InteriorModules, TechCategory.InteriorModule,techType);
Way easier, if you'll ask me =(^^)=
PrimeSonic
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2018
MrPurple6411
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2022
Convert to Bepinex and Fix a few other issues.
toebeann
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Heyo (^^)/
Almost everything is descibed in the commits or with comments in the code