Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] fix exp returns incorrect value #47842

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

839224346
Copy link
Contributor

Why I'm doing:

exp func returns NULL when input greater than 6
image

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

@839224346 839224346 force-pushed the fix_exp_func branch 3 times, most recently from a95af6a to a28172c Compare July 4, 2024 10:57
@839224346
Copy link
Contributor Author

One concern is that should exp returns NULL when std::exp calculates infinity for output that's greater than the max value of double type.

@839224346
Copy link
Contributor Author

Feels like it should return inf rather than null when the output value of std::exp is greater than the max value of double type, just like other math functions.

@839224346 839224346 force-pushed the fix_exp_func branch 3 times, most recently from e97da13 to 88d7394 Compare July 4, 2024 15:52
Seaven
Seaven previously approved these changes Jul 5, 2024
@Seaven
Copy link
Contributor

Seaven commented Jul 5, 2024

Feels like it should return inf rather than null when the output value of std::exp is greater than the max value of double type, just like other math functions.

ignore the approve, should return NULL when overflow the max value, and the change doesn't explain why exp(7) is NULL ? the result of exp(7) is 1096? it's doesn't hit the limit.

@839224346
Copy link
Contributor Author

839224346 commented Jul 5, 2024

@Seaven The reason that exp(7) returns NULL is ExpCheck function actually compares the output of exp(7) with MAX_EXP_PARAMETER and MAX_EXP_PARAMETER equals to std::log(std::numeric_limits<double>::max()). It should be the output of exp(7) comparing with std::numeric_limits<double>::max().
Furthermore, the exp function should be compatible with pow(e, xxx), which returns inf when the output value is larger than the max value of double type.

@Seaven
Copy link
Contributor

Seaven commented Jul 5, 2024

@Seaven The reason that exp(7) returns NULL is ExpCheck function actually compares the output of exp(7) with MAX_EXP_PARAMETER and MAX_EXP_PARAMETER equals to std::log(std::numeric_limits<double>::max()). It should be the output of exp(7) comparing with std::numeric_limits<double>::max(). Furthermore, the exp function should be compatible with pow(e, xxx), which returns inf when the output value is larger than the max value of double type.

@Seaven The reason that exp(7) returns NULL is ExpCheck function actually compares the output of exp(7) with MAX_EXP_PARAMETER and MAX_EXP_PARAMETER equals to std::log(std::numeric_limits<double>::max()). It should be the output of exp(7) comparing with std::numeric_limits<double>::max(). Furthermore, the exp function should be compatible with pow(e, xxx), which returns inf when the output value is larger than the max value of double type.

I get it, I think you find a bug about pow, we should to change the result of pow(e, 710) to null~ for some math expression, starrocks has problem when overflow, we want the result is right-value or null or throw exception, not inf/nan, it's different with MySQL

@839224346
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Seaven The reason that exp(7) returns NULL is ExpCheck function actually compares the output of exp(7) with MAX_EXP_PARAMETER and MAX_EXP_PARAMETER equals to std::log(std::numeric_limits<double>::max()). It should be the output of exp(7) comparing with std::numeric_limits<double>::max(). Furthermore, the exp function should be compatible with pow(e, xxx), which returns inf when the output value is larger than the max value of double type.

@Seaven The reason that exp(7) returns NULL is ExpCheck function actually compares the output of exp(7) with MAX_EXP_PARAMETER and MAX_EXP_PARAMETER equals to std::log(std::numeric_limits<double>::max()). It should be the output of exp(7) comparing with std::numeric_limits<double>::max(). Furthermore, the exp function should be compatible with pow(e, xxx), which returns inf when the output value is larger than the max value of double type.

I get it, I think you find a bug about pow, we should to change the result of pow(e, 710) to null~ for some math expression, starrocks has problem when overflow, we want the result is right-value or null or throw exception, not inf/nan, it's different with MySQL

Understood, will revise the code shortly.

…on returns NULL when output value is infinity

Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2024

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2024

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 3 / 3 (100.00%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 be/src/exprs/math_functions.cpp 3 3 100.00% []

@839224346
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Seaven Pls have a look again~

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 2.5 label Jul 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 9, 2024

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 9, 2024

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 9, 2024

backport branch-3.1

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 9, 2024

backport branch-3.0

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 9, 2024

backport branch-2.5

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e89d2e6)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e89d2e6)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e89d2e6)

# Conflicts:
#	be/src/exprs/math_functions.cpp
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e89d2e6)

# Conflicts:
#	be/src/exprs/math_functions.cpp
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e89d2e6)

# Conflicts:
#	be/src/exprs/vectorized/math_functions.cpp
Seaven pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e89d2e6)

Signed-off-by: Yi <[email protected]>
Seaven pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e89d2e6)

Signed-off-by: Yi <[email protected]>
Seaven pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e89d2e6)

Signed-off-by: Yi <[email protected]>
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
Seaven pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e89d2e6)

Signed-off-by: Yi <[email protected]>
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants