Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pin cvxpy to known-good version #10997

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jakelishman
Copy link
Member

Summary

Some diamond-norm tests are failing with the latest 1.4.0 release of cvxpy. Given the complex optimisation problem that the dnorm represents, it's quite possible that randomised tests would already have had a low success rate, and this is just a case of some internal tweaks destabilising the particular operator choice in our test.

Details and comments

Hopefully should get CI running again.

Some diamond-norm tests are failing with the latest 1.4.0 release of
cvxpy.  Given the complex optimisation problem that the dnorm
represents, it's quite possible that randomised tests would already have
had a low success rate, and this is just a case of some internal tweaks
destabilising the particular operator choice in our test.
@jakelishman jakelishman added type: qa Issues and PRs that relate to testing and code quality stable backport potential The bug might be minimal and/or import enough to be port to stable Changelog: None Do not include in changelog labels Oct 10, 2023
@jakelishman jakelishman requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2023 10:13
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 6467869439

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 9 unchanged lines in 3 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.007%) to 87.012%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
crates/qasm2/src/expr.rs 1 93.76%
crates/qasm2/src/lex.rs 2 90.66%
crates/qasm2/src/parse.rs 6 97.13%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 6459425763: -0.007%
Covered Lines: 74161
Relevant Lines: 85231

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Contributor

@ElePT ElePT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ElePT ElePT enabled auto-merge October 10, 2023 10:57
@ElePT ElePT added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2023
Merged via the queue into Qiskit:main with commit 337832e Oct 10, 2023
14 checks passed
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
Some diamond-norm tests are failing with the latest 1.4.0 release of
cvxpy.  Given the complex optimisation problem that the dnorm
represents, it's quite possible that randomised tests would already have
had a low success rate, and this is just a case of some internal tweaks
destabilising the particular operator choice in our test.

(cherry picked from commit 337832e)
@jakelishman jakelishman deleted the constrain-cvxpy branch October 10, 2023 14:23
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
Some diamond-norm tests are failing with the latest 1.4.0 release of
cvxpy.  Given the complex optimisation problem that the dnorm
represents, it's quite possible that randomised tests would already have
had a low success rate, and this is just a case of some internal tweaks
destabilising the particular operator choice in our test.

(cherry picked from commit 337832e)

Co-authored-by: Jake Lishman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: None Do not include in changelog stable backport potential The bug might be minimal and/or import enough to be port to stable type: qa Issues and PRs that relate to testing and code quality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants