Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix gemspec #6

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2012
Merged

Fix gemspec #6

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2012

Conversation

Cluster444
Copy link
Contributor

The gemspec had some validation errors, removed some of the non-existent files, and fixed the description/homepage fields.

This will let people use git branches from a Gemfile properly.

@texel
Copy link
Owner

texel commented Jan 13, 2012

So funny thing... this isn't the canonical repo, it's just the very first one to be created. The gem isn't really maintained as such, and it doesn't get deployed out of here, so changing the homepage, while probably not harmful, isn't technically correct either.

@Cluster444
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there another way of getting this gem? I was trying to use it with backupgem which depends on runt >= 0.3.0, it pulls down 0.7.0 from rubygems which has syntax errors in ruby 1.9. I was trying to pull down master from this repo as it seems to have the syntax issues fixed, which is where I was getting the gemspec validation errors.

The problem with the homepage wasn't a matter of where it's pointed so much as it was not a valid URL, the homepage was the description, and the description was blank.

texel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2012
@texel texel merged commit 58234c0 into texel:master Jan 13, 2012
djmaze pushed a commit to school-scout/runt that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2018
[Fixes texel#5] removed check_dependencies task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants