Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Guidelines for grouping fossil specimens into organisms. #19

Open
dennereed opened this issue Nov 4, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Guidelines for grouping fossil specimens into organisms. #19

dennereed opened this issue Nov 4, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@dennereed
Copy link
Contributor

dennereed commented Nov 4, 2017

Darwin Core is generally setup to record whole organisms, whereas the most common paleobiology use cases include portions of organisms. The Organism class could serve as a grouping factor that indicates when multiple fossils belong to the same organism. Is this a suitable best practice recommendation for paleobiology.
Furthermore, is there a controlled vocabulary to recommend for organismScope? What is recommended best practice in paleobiology for use of organismID vs associatedOccurrences?

@dennereed
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging this thread with #17
The individualCount, organismQuantity and organismQuantityType terms are designed to track the number of individual organisms in an occurrence measured as specimens, biomass etc. How does this translate to paleontology? Comparable concepts in paleobiology are Number of Identified Specimens (NISP) and Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI). Is there an available vocabulary for these terms? What should be our recommendation?

@hollyel
Copy link
Collaborator

hollyel commented Oct 22, 2018

Also see discussion happening here tdwg/dwc#185

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants