You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are two methods that traverse the inspector tree:
childrenCount - this method traverses the tree once to count all the nodes
getRowIndex - this method traverses the tree until it reaches the given node. When the tree is initially built, this method is called on every single node 😬 (although the results are cached)
Ideally these two methods could be combined, so that we don't have to modify our tree traversal logic in two places. Furthermore, on initial load of the tree we should build all rows in a single traversal of the tree, instead of traversing it n times.
Further optimizations:
When a node is marked as dirty (e.g., it has been expanded or collapsed), we should rebuild only the rows in that node's branch instead of the entire tree. Because currently multiple nodes are marked as dirty for a single update, we will need to be careful to not rebuild more times than necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are two methods that traverse the inspector tree:
Ideally these two methods could be combined, so that we don't have to modify our tree traversal logic in two places. Furthermore, on initial load of the tree we should build all rows in a single traversal of the tree, instead of traversing it n times.
Further optimizations:
dirty
(e.g., it has been expanded or collapsed), we should rebuild only the rows in that node's branch instead of the entire tree. Because currently multiple nodes are marked asdirty
for a single update, we will need to be careful to not rebuild more times than necessary.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: